But even in clean profile Waterfox proved to be slightly slower than Firefox, I did two benchmarks for each browser. If you don't any special requirements, it's best to pick the most current version to download. I have measured in clean profile and it's 30 faster than my user profile.
#Waterfox vs firefox for mac os#
Waterfox isn't just for Windows, but for Mac OS and Linux as well. However, it's so close to Firefox that no user should be afraid to try out Waterfox if desired: After starting up, Waterfox even offers to copy the user's settings from an existing Firefox installation.Īll the usual Firefox add-ons can also be installed with no problem. Responding to a query from a user on reddit, Kontos said that the existence of Waterfox Classic depends on whether security fixes from Firefox ESR91 can be ported to the Classic version. The Waterfox browser offers other features in the Classic version, such as the installation of plug-ins like Silverlight or Java via an interface that Mozilla itself has long since done away with. Waterfox Classic could be coming to an end, says Alex Kontos, the developer of the Firefox-fork. But then there are users who consider even the mere presence of such a function undesirable: The Waterfox browser, free of telemetry, is for them. If a user isn't interested in having their data sent to Mozilla, they can turn off the telemetry function in Settings. Their names might involve fire and water, but they aren't as far apart as you would think: There is relatively little that makes the Firefox browser different from one of its offshoots, Waterfox.Īn example of just one of the differences is the telemetry function: Firefox collects these technical details and interactions, and sends them to the developer, Mozilla, every day to improve the software.
0 kommentar(er)
